Re: paul and odds and sods

[AnEnglishBoy <campbell@fix.net>]

Sroundtable@aol.com wrote:




>  The comment about O&S was based on legit logic, if not entirely true.  I will
> defer to you as to O&S's traditions since I obviously have virtually no
> experience over there.

What?

Is this a glimmer in the darkness of hope beyond hope?

Is this an indication that Mc doesn't always have to be
"right," and fight to the very edge of everyone's sanity
trying to prove it, however irrationally?

AEBoy~