[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Pete & Mick @ Concert for NYC



Don't be surprised to see Pete playing with Mick Jagger at the Concert for 
New York.  He played on three tracks on Jagger's new sold album -- Goddess 
in the Doorway.

David in NYC

>From: TheWho-Digest-Owner@igtc.com (The Who Mailing List Digest)
>Reply-To: TheWho@igtc.com
>To: TheWho-Digest@igtc.com
>Subject: The Who Mailing List Digest V8 #273
>Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 10:53:00 -0700
>
>The Who Mailing List Digest
>   Sunday, October 7 2001  Volume 08 : Number 273
>
>
>
>In this issue:
>
>	NEW: Searchable archives at igtc.com
>	NYC Benefit Concert: Who,When,etc...
>	TM link for MSG
>	videos
>	Fwd: Re: Odds&Sods-Digest - Number 2203
>	Fwd: RE: Lazy Fat People
>	City of Hope charity
>	Re: Odds&Sods-Digest - Number 2203
>	Re: NYC benefit
>	Re: NYC benefit
>	Re: NYC benefit
>	Re: NYC benefit
>	RAH DVD
>	QUAD movie
>	Fwd: VIP Tickets for The Concert For New York
>	Re: NYC benefit
>	Re: NYC benefit
>	RAH
>	Re: RAH
>	Re: The Who Mailing List Digest V8 #272
>	LAL DE
>	Pete's Sunday
>	weekly downloads
>	Re: LAL DE
>	Re: RAH
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 10:48:18 -0700
>From: "Paul M. Moriarty" <pmm@igtc.com>
>Subject: NEW: Searchable archives at igtc.com
>
>Hi!
>
>I'm pleased to announce that the mailing list archives are now fully
>searchable.  Check it out at http://www.igtc.com/search.html
>
>The archives themselves are located at http://www.igtc.com/archives/
>
>Enjoy!
>
>- - Paul -
>
>- --
>Maintainer, igtc.com mailing lists
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 14:29:31
>From: "Derick Bhupsingh" <circles01@hotmail.com>
>Subject: NYC Benefit Concert: Who,When,etc...
>
>Seeing that people are wondering about what time and when The Who should
>go on,I'd like to say this: Their normal time is somewhere between 9.00pm
>and 9.15 pm. And that's whenthey should go on. Never mind before or after
>whoelse,just go on at your usual time if possibleand show the world how
>great this band is!  Maybe,finally they may get the recognition theydeserve
>and a lot of people may begin to ask themselves just what they have been
>missing!Long live Rock,The Who and God Bless the USA!Regards,Derick.
>
>- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 07:03:06 -0400
>From: "Jeff House" <whocasa@hotmail.com>
>Subject: TM link for MSG
>
>https://ticketing.ticketmaster.com/cgi/purchasePage.asp?event_id=1D003343BC73B889&event_code=ESG1020E
>
>I notice they list the start time as 7:30.
>
>Jeff
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 14:21:28 +0000
>From: "L. Bird" <pkeets@hotmail.com>
>Subject: videos
>
>I've been watching VH1, and I notice Michael Jackson has put out a new 
>video
>for his album.  It's actually a 15 minute film, but they've cut it down for
>play on the air.  They've avoided close-ups; the guy looks awful--but it's
>debuted at number 10.  That's support from VH1, and I wonder why.  Because
>Jackson is a proven money-maker?  Does he pay off the network?
>
>Anyhow, I'd love to see part of RAH play there somewhere.  I'm still hoping
>they'll play some of it in support of the NYC gig.
>
>
>keets
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 07:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
>From: thewho rocks <leb905@yahoo.com>
>Subject: Fwd: Re: Odds&Sods-Digest - Number 2203
>
>Forward from O&S:
>
> >
> > Re:
> > While My Guitar Gently Weeps (Wish George could make
> > it there do play lead on this.)
> >
> > This show at MSG is going to be a Beatles reunion. I
> > thought everyone knew that already!! Paul certainly
> > didnt ask Led Zeppelin to reform without making
> > arangements to perform with his old bandmates. So both
> > George and Ringo will be there.
> > Love Duke
>
>
>=====
>Don't meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste 
>good with ketchup.
>NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just 
>$8.95/month.
>http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 07:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
>From: thewho rocks <leb905@yahoo.com>
>Subject: Fwd: RE: Lazy Fat People
>
>Forward from O&S:
>
> > > > > Over at his site, he's posted his demo for Fang's favorite song
> >
> > > > > "Lazy Fat People."
> > > > >
> > > > > Go to:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.petetownshend.com/pr_display.cfm?id=251&zone=diary
> > >
> > > So I did, and guess what? It's gone!
> >
> > Pete's moved them over to eelpie. Go to:
> > http://www.eelpie.com/downloads.cfm
>
>
>=====
>Don't meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste 
>good with ketchup.
>NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just 
>$8.95/month.
>http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 13:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
>From: thewho rocks <leb905@yahoo.com>
>Subject: City of Hope charity
>
>Roger will also be performing at this benefit in LA.  Looks like they
>have an auction on Yahoo, including memoribilia from various stars,
>including a poster from Roger.
>
>http://user.auctions.yahoo.com/show/auctions?userID=cityofhopecharity&u=%3acityofhopecharity\
>
>LB
>
>=====
>Don't meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste 
>good with ketchup.
>NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just 
>$8.95/month.
>http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 17:20:50 EDT
>From: TJLY99@aol.com
>Subject: Re: Odds&Sods-Digest - Number 2203
>
>ringo made a statement that he couldn't be there cause he was planning
>something else and offered his deep regrets. "access hollyood" had the 
>story.
>     dunno about george though, but it might seem impossible since he's 
>been
>staying home to recoop after his battles with cancer.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 19:21:42 -0400
>From: "Scott Schrade" <schrade@akrobiz.com>
>Subject: Re: NYC benefit
>
> > >did you ever think that the cause is more important than what band goes 
>on
> > >before and after the who?
> >
> > Sure, but people do notice these things
>
>Not really on these occasions - too many artists.  Sure, some of the lesser 
>acts
>will be put on first & something BIG will be planned for the end but 
>whoever
>plays *after* The Who won't be thought of as having been *supported* by The
>Who.  Did that make sense?
>
> > >and hey listen, if they do a good performance and go on before the
> > >"younger" acts, they may bring a boost in their record sales.
> >
> > So everybody thinks they're a younger band?
>
>Er....I don't think that's possible anymore.
>
>
>- - SCHRADE
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2001 00:20:25 +0000
>From: "L. Bird" <pkeets@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: NYC benefit
>
> >Not really on these occasions - too many artists.  Sure, some of the 
>lesser
> >acts will be put on first & something BIG will be planned for the end but
> >whoever plays *after* The Who won't be thought of as having been
> >*supported* by The Who.  Did that make sense?
>
>Okay, sure.  I'll take your word for it that everybody shelves their ego.
>;)
>
>Actually, it's just a topic for discussion, like the lists of songs
>everybody thinks they should play.  TJ already came up with an interesting
>comment, that playing earlier might catch a younger crowd that will lose
>intrest as older acts come on.
>
>Also, if this event is arranged like some others, then riff-raff like The
>Who might play earlier with the other riff-raff and the uh-hum, more 
>serious
>and mature artists will play toward the end.
>
>Did I mention a Pete solo performance might be in order?  Pete would fit in
>well with the more serious crowd.  It would be great to see some of the
>artists match up for duets or whatever, too.  Wonder if they'd have any
>rehearsal time for that before the show?  Otherwise, there are likely to be
>impromptu match-ups like at the Bridge School benefit where everybody
>sneaked out on stage to sing backup.
>
>
>  > >and hey listen, if they do a good performance and go on before the
>"younger" acts, they may bring a boost in their record sales.
> > >
> > > So everybody thinks they're a younger band?
> >
> >Er....I don't think that's possible anymore.
>
>Oh.  You don't think they could lie about their age?  Well, shoot.  I'm
>disappointed.  You know, I saw them on VH1 and I thought they were a New
>Wave group.  Didn't they start around 1980?
>
>;)
>keets
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 20:27:39 -0400
>From: "Jeff House" <whocasa@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: NYC benefit
>
>My inside sources tell me that The Who will perform very early in the show.
>It is not a bad slot, Sprinsteen opened the "Heroes" telethon and was
>arguably THE star.
>
>BTW, my inside sources are inside my head :-)
>
>Jeff
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2001 00:51:09 +0000
>From: "L. Bird" <pkeets@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: NYC benefit
>
>When does it start?  Eight?  Nine?  JAE has gotta be out and set up at
>BBKing's before ten, right?  Another place The Who might play is at the end
>of the first half.
>
>The Heroes show was terrific, and I think these huge benefits have come a
>long way as far as organization goes since the days of Live Aid.  For
>anybody who hasn't seen the Freddie Mercury Tribute tape, I'd certainly
>recommend it.  I was fascinated by the way they handled the whole thing.
>
>Like I said, the riff-raff played first.  Liz Taylor made the mistake of
>trying to talk part way through and was booed--I suspect she was supposed 
>to
>give the opening speech and turned up late.  So the crowd was all crazy 
>from
>listening to the metal bands, and how are they going to get that under
>control for the soft rockers.  Answer:  Roger Daltrey.  I'll bet he 
>deafened
>a whole stadium full of people.
>
>;)
>keets
>
>
>
> >My inside sources tell me that The Who will perform very early in the 
>show.
> >It is not a bad slot, Sprinsteen opened the "Heroes" telethon and was
> >arguably THE star.
> >
> >BTW, my inside sources are inside my head :-)
> >
> >Jeff
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 18:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
>From: thewho rocks <leb905@yahoo.com>
>Subject: RAH DVD
>
>Movin' on up...   :)
>
>Sales ranks:
>
>DVD @ 100 Amazon.com
>VHS @ 1118 Amazon.com
>DVD @ 119 Amazon.co.uk
>VHS @  74 Amazon.co.uk
>
>
>
> >I was in HMV's store today (Canterbury U.K.) and noticed The Who's
>Royal Albert Hall DVD was at no.16 in their Top 40.
>
>=====
>Don't meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste 
>good with ketchup.
>NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just 
>$8.95/month.
>http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 18:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
>From: thewho rocks <leb905@yahoo.com>
>Subject: QUAD movie
>
>Here's QUAD:
>
>DVD 165 @ Amazon.com
>VHS 3662 @Amazon.com
>
>Are the mods more upscale these days?  Lots of fans out there with DVD
>players.
>
>LB
>
>=====
>Don't meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste 
>good with ketchup.
>NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just 
>$8.95/month.
>http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 19:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
>From: thewho rocks <leb905@yahoo.com>
>Subject: Fwd: VIP Tickets for The Concert For New York
>
> > >From the Robin Hood Organization at:
> > http://www.robinhood.org/concert.html
> >
> > VIP tickets are available through Robin Hood on
> > a first-come, first-serve basis at three price levels:
> >
> >  Platinum Ticket(s) at $10,000
> > The best seating plus an exclusive reception in the VIP Lounge with
> > visits
> > by the performers
> > All but $175 per ticket is tax deductible.
> >
> >  Gold Ticket(s) at $5,000 each
> > Prime seating and private cocktail reception
> > All but $150 per ticket is tax deductible.
> >
> >  Silver Ticket(s) at $2,000 each (SOLD OUT)
> > Great Seats!
> > All but $100 per ticket is tax deductible.
> >
> > All other tickets will go on sale via Ticketmaster on Monday, October
> > 8th at
> > 9:00am. Prices range from $250-$500. Please call (212) 307-7171 to
> > purchase
> > tickets.
> >
> > To reserve VIP tickets please complete the attached form and return
> > to
> > Debbie Fife at Event Associates (email:
> > debbief@eventassociatesinc.com or
> > fax: (212) 581-8717). No phone orders for VIP tickets will be
> > accepted. All
> > orders will be confirmed by phone or email as received. Payment by
> > check or
> > credit card must be received by October 12th. All tax receipts will
> > be
> > generated following the concert.
> >
> > Tickets can either be sent via Fed Ex or delivered by messenger.
> > Please
> > include an additional $15 in your ticket order for this purpose.
> >
> > Proceeds from the concert will go directly to the Robin Hood Relief
> > Fund to
> > meet the immediate and long-term needs of victims of the September
> > 11th
> > attack. In particular, Robin Hood will help lower-income New Yorkers
> > affected by the tragedy, while through its support of the Twin Towers
> > Fund,
> > it will aid the families of police, fire, and rescue workers who
> > courageously gave their lives to help others. Additionally, 5,000
> > firefighters, police, and rescue workers will be guests at the
> > concert.
> >
> > Maximum of 10 tickets per order, please.
> >
> > Now is the time to come to New York! If you're out-of-town and want
> > to
> > attend this historic concert, you can stay at New York's landmark
> > Plaza
> > Hotel for a special concert rate of $199 per night on either October
> > 19th or
> > October 20th. Mention this special offer when making your reservation
> > and
> > show your tickets at check-in.
>
>
>=====
>Don't meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste 
>good with ketchup.
>NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just 
>$8.95/month.
>http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 23:11:20 -0400
>From: "Scott Schrade" <schrade@akrobiz.com>
>Subject: Re: NYC benefit
>
> > Okay, sure.  I'll take your word for it that everybody shelves their 
>ego.
>
>They'd better considering what this concert is about.
>
> > Actually, it's just a topic for discussion, like the lists of songs
> > everybody thinks they should play.  TJ already came up with an 
>interesting
> > comment, that playing earlier might catch a younger crowd that will lose
> > intrest as older acts come on.
>
>Either way it'll be a pretty large viewing audience.
>
> > Also, if this event is arranged like some others, then riff-raff like 
>The
> > Who might play earlier with the other riff-raff and the uh-hum, more 
>serious
> > and mature artists will play toward the end.
>
>I think The Who will have a featured position in the line up, probably 
>towards
>the end.  You're making it sound like they're B-list players here.  
>Remember:
>this is a live show & who puts on a better live show than The Who?  I 
>suspect
>others artists are frightened to death to follow The Who.
>
> > Did I mention a Pete solo performance might be in order?
>
>Solo performance?  How long do you think this show's gonna last?  Maybe
>Pete will do a duet with someone else but I doubt he'll do a solo 
>performance,
>unless it's a song within The Who's set.
>
> > > > So everybody thinks they're a younger band?
> > >
> > >Er....I don't think that's possible anymore.
> >
> > Oh.  You don't think they could lie about their age?
>
>Maybe if the cameras showed only Zak they might get away with it!
>
>
>- - SCHRADE in Akron
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2001 03:26:23 +0000
>From: "L. Bird" <pkeets@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: NYC benefit
>
> >I think The Who will have a featured position in the line up, probably
> >towards the end.  You're making it sound like they're B-list players 
>here.
> >Remember: this is a live show & who puts on a better live show than The
> >Who?  I suspect others artists are frightened to death to follow The Who.
>
>That's what I mean.  :)  The Who are competitive stacked against anybody
>there, and whoever follows them had better be good.  That means they're not
>scared of playing with the hot young groups the way some of the older stars
>might be.  I'm sure they'll play where it's convenient so they can get John
>out to BBKing's.
>
>The riff raff thing is about how The Who still seems to be viewed by some
>Pete solo fans.  Like you can't play rock and roll and still be a serious
>musician and composer.  ;)
>
>BTW, has anybody heard what younger groups might make it?  Mostly all we 
>see
>in the ads are the classic rockers.
>
>
> > > Oh.  You don't think they could lie about their age?
> >
> >Maybe if the cameras showed only Zak they might get away with it!
>
>Don't you think they could knock ten years off?  Well, maybe twenty in
>Roger's case.  :)
>
>
>keets
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 23:39:04 -0400
>From: "Scott Schrade" <schrade@akrobiz.com>
>Subject: RAH
>
>Well I got my VHS copy of the RAH show & like everyone says,
>it's pretty good.  Nice picture & sound (maybe a little too much
>Rabbit in the mix - and OX is never loud enough for my tastes).
>
>Most of the songs are performed well.  "Magic Bus" & Roger's
>harmonica playing are outstanding.  So is the violin solo in "Baba
>O'Riley."
>
>There are some awkward moments (aren't there always at a Who
>show?).  "Anyway, Anyhow, Anywhere" is kinda fucked up.  And
>there's some goofy, between-song moments that I'm surprised weren't
>edited out (Daltrey having trouble adjusting his mic stand & Daltrey
>announcing Paul Weller before the wrong song).
>
>The guests:  "Let's See Action" with Eddie Vedder is just plain bad.
>He does a fine job on "I'm One," though.  Fuck Bryan Adams.  Kelly
>Jones (no, not *Kenny* Jones - har) kinda sucked - although his vo-
>cal phrasing on "Substitute" was interesting.
>
>Paul Weller's vocals were sorta shaky on "So Sad About Us" but
>I'll give him (and Pete) credit for doing the song in the first place.
>What else did Paul Weller do?  Can't remember.
>
>Noel Gallagher plays some loud, if simple, guitar on WGFA & doesn't
>get in the way at all.
>
>Roger's voice is a bit off every now & then, & the zip-zoom camera
>edits are sometimes frustrating.  The obtrusive camera placed on OX's
>bass for "5:15" is borderline comical but that's quickly forgotten once
>his mastery is on display.
>
>Even despite my criticisms this video was fun to watch & is a nice re-
>minder of how wonderful the 2000 tour was.
>
>Final Grade:  B
>
>
>- - SCHRADE in Akron
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2001 04:51:46 +0000
>From: "L. Bird" <pkeets@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: RAH
>
> >Most of the songs are performed well.  "Magic Bus" & Roger's
> >harmonica playing are outstanding.  So is the violin solo in "Baba
> >O'Riley."
>
>Different opinions on Kennedy.  It's kind of a different interpretation.  I
>liked the first and last part, but not the middle.  Looks like Roger was
>gritting his teeth.  :)
>
>
> >There are some awkward moments (aren't there always at a Who
> >show?).  "Anyway, Anyhow, Anywhere" is kinda fucked up.  And
> >there's some goofy, between-song moments that I'm surprised weren't
> >edited out (Daltrey having trouble adjusting his mic stand & Daltrey
> >announcing Paul Weller before the wrong song).
>
>Human interest?  A couple of folks have said it's a great video but it
>wasn't the best of shows--meaning there was some awkwardness in it.  I
>remember comments at the time, too, about the comedian that was booed at
>half-time and unresponsive audience and etc.  It looks to me like there may
>have been problems with the venue and camera angles.  Everybody is staring
>into lights that leave them completely blind, and they pretty much keep
>their eyes closed.  I don't much like the dead on shots, either.
>
>Some of the camera angles were outrageously good, though.  They've really
>set up to catch John's work on this one.  Great shots of Zak, and Rabbit at
>work, also, when he's generally ignored.
>
>
> >Paul Weller's vocals were sorta shaky on "So Sad About Us" but
> >I'll give him (and Pete) credit for doing the song in the first place. 
>What
> >else did Paul Weller do?  Can't remember.
>
>Rehearsal.
>
>
> >Noel Gallagher plays some loud, if simple, guitar on WGFA & doesn't
> >get in the way at all.
>
>He looks like he's really trying hard on it.  Mostly it's just a slightly
>more layered sound, but then he does that oscillation thing and suddenly
>it's a solo.  Very nice.
>
>
> >Roger's voice is a bit off every now & then, & the zip-zoom camera
> >edits are sometimes frustrating.  The obtrusive camera placed on OX's
> >bass for "5:15" is borderline comical but that's quickly forgotten once 
>his
> >mastery is on display.
>
>That's the one I think they should play on VH1/MTV.  It's too long, so it
>would need to be edited some way, but the style is perfect, and I think it
>would be competitive.  There are a couple of spots where Roger would pass
>for twenty.  And that shot down the bass is pretty obviously the guy who
>wrote Boris the Spider  :)
>
>
>keets
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 08:54:54 -0400
>From: "andrew wiechman" <Jovar1701v@email.msn.com>
>Subject: Re: The Who Mailing List Digest V8 #272
>
>I don' think the whole digest made it through, the mailing process.
>- ----- Original Message -----
>From: The Who Mailing List Digest <TheWho-Digest-Owner@igtc.com>
>To: <TheWho-Digest@igtc.com>
>Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 12:53 PM
>Subject: The Who Mailing List Digest V8 #272
>
>
> >
> > The Who Mailing List Digest
> >  Saturday, October 6 2001 Volume 08 : Number 272
> >
> >
> >
> > In this issue:
> >
> > "tommy"
> > It's Paul's show
> > Re: Eugene
> > Re: maybe off topic - BB King after party on VH1
> > Re: "tommy"
> > Re: It's Paul's show
> > drag
> > NYC benefit
> > Pete fiddling with his website
> > Re: drag
> > Re: drag
> > Re: NYC benefit
> > Re: drag
> > Re: NYC benefit
> > Fwd: MuchMusic to carry Concert In New York
> > Re: NYC benefit
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > End of The Who Mailing List Digest V8 #272
> > ******************************************
> >
> > To unsubscribe to The Who Mailing List, send mail to majordomo@igtc.com
>with
> > the following in the body of the message:
> >
> >     unsubscribe thewho-digest
> >
> > Back issues are available for anonymous FTP from ftp.igtc.com in
> > /pub/pmm/thewho.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 07:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
>From: thewho rocks <leb905@yahoo.com>
>Subject: LAL DE
>
>Customer reviews of LAL DE are coming in at Amazon.com and
>Amazon.co.uk.  Looks like most fans haven't noticed any serious
>problems, and the reviews are very positive.
>
>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/music/B00005NB0H/customer-reviews/ref=bxgy_cc_text_a/103-1417352-6103811
>
>The UK page has sound clips, as well as the reviews, including one of
>stage banter.
>
>http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00005NB0H/o/qid=/sr=8-1/ref=sr_aps_pm_1_1/026-4790688-0201267
>
>
>
>LB
>
>=====
>Don't meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste 
>good with ketchup.
>NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just 
>$8.95/month.
>http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 09:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
>From: thewho rocks <leb905@yahoo.com>
>Subject: Pete's Sunday
>
>Having a hard days, it seems.
>
>http://www.petetownshend.com/pr_display.cfm?id=258&zone=diary
>
>
>LB
>
>=====
>Don't meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste 
>good with ketchup.
>NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just 
>$8.95/month.
>http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 09:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
>From: thewho rocks <leb905@yahoo.com>
>Subject: weekly downloads
>
>Pete has announced that the weekly downloads should take place at
>Eelpie.com.  Sure enough, these look to be .ram files rather than mp3s
>as in the past.  Hmmm.  I wonder if that's to foil folks who have been
>burning these to cd and selling them?
>
>http://www.petetownshend.com/pr_display.cfm?id=257&zone=pr
>
>
>LB
>
>=====
>Don't meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste 
>good with ketchup.
>NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just 
>$8.95/month.
>http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 13:12:03 -0400
>From: "Scott Schrade" <schrade@akrobiz.com>
>Subject: Re: LAL DE
>
> > Customer reviews of LAL DE are coming in at Amazon.com and
> > Amazon.co.uk.  Looks like most fans haven't noticed any serious
> > problems, and the reviews are very positive.
>
>
>Hmmm.....wonder why the horrible sound quality people talk about on
>other lists isn't being heard by the general public.  Hmmm.....that's 
>inter-
>esting.
>
>- - SCHRADE in Akron
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 13:40:59 -0400
>From: "Scott Schrade" <schrade@akrobiz.com>
>Subject: Re: RAH
>
> > Different opinions on Kennedy.  It's kind of a different interpretation. 
>  I
> > liked the first and last part, but not the middle.  Looks like Roger was
> > gritting his teeth.  :)
>
>No way!  That was a jaw-dropping violin solo.  I kept waiting for him to
>fuck up but he never did.  A highlight of the show.
>
> > A couple of folks have said it's a great video but it
> > wasn't the best of shows--meaning there was some awkwardness in it.
>
>Was there an intermission at this show?  I noticed Zak & Pete's outfits
>change part-way through the tape.
>
> > Some of the camera angles were outrageously good, though.  They've 
>really
> > set up to catch John's work on this one.  Great shots of Zak, and Rabbit 
>at
> > work, also, when he's generally ignored.
>
>Yeah, there were some nice closeups of Rabbit's fingerwork (!).  Some of
>the closeups of OX's fingerwork were disappointing because, as in other
>rock videos, the camera man focuses only on his right hand plucking the
>strings & not his left hand fretting the notes.  The best OX shots (!) are 
>the
>ones from the waist up, showing both hands at work.
>
> > >Noel Gallagher plays some loud, if simple, guitar on WGFA & doesn't
> > >get in the way at all.
> >
> > He looks like he's really trying hard on it.  Mostly it's just a 
>slightly
> > more layered sound, but then he does that oscillation thing and suddenly
> > it's a solo.  Very nice.
>
>Yeah, he stayed away from playing the exact note patterns that Pete would
>play & smartly created some fresh-sounding "mini-solos" as it were.
>
>RE: "5:15"
> > That's the one I think they should play on VH1/MTV.  It's too long, so 
>it
> > would need to be edited some way, but the style is perfect, and I think 
>it
> > would be competitive.
>
>"5:15" would be a good one or an edited "Magic Bus" which really got the
>crowd (& the band) going.  Wouldn't VH1 have to get The Who's permis-
>sion to use a clip from the show?
>
>
>- - SCHRADE in Akron
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of The Who Mailing List Digest V8 #273
>******************************************
>
>To unsubscribe to The Who Mailing List, send mail to majordomo@igtc.com 
>with
>the following in the body of the message:
>
>     unsubscribe thewho-digest
>
>Back issues are available for anonymous FTP from ftp.igtc.com in
>/pub/pmm/thewho.