Pete does interpret his own music well. I never said he didn't. BUT he doesn't attract the same breadth of audience solo as he does with The Who. Also, he doesn't promote himself well. keets P.S. John's got this same problem. >From 1975 on, however, I feel that Pete was an equal interpreter to The Who >and sometimes superior. > >Finally, a voice of reason. > >AnEnglishBoy~