[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Who Mailing List Digest V8 #74



At the same time though, why should you and others think that because they
are over 50 and *you want them to*, they should tour or record?  I think
what most people forget is that performers are their own people and
ultimately they will do what they want to do.  And Pete doesn't want to
write and record new Who.  simple as that

Drew

Andreas J. Athans
UNH Chemistry Dept.
Parsons Hall #209
University of New Hampshire
Durham,NH 03824

On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 Oshangrl@aol.com wrote:

>
> In a message dated 3/21/01 6:58:41 AM, TheWho-Digest-Owner@igtc.com writes:
>
> << Isnt it a better idea to see what happens? Lets not forget TED are getting
> really old.
> I cant see a new album being released (Pete has other solo-things going on)
> and even if that album should emerge I cant see it would be succesfull in
> any way. Lets face it: Lifehouse is a masterpiece (chronicles) but how did
> it sell? Pete only seems to go for no less than the standard he has put for
> himself. I dont think this will include The Who.
> (hopefully). >>
>
> Uhh..Bruce Springsteen, Paul McCartney,  Carlos Santana......why is it that
> some people think that just because rock musicians are over 50 they no longer
> can perform live or produce hits?  Why should they be  regarded as being
> different than any other artists? Just because they're "rock" musicians
> doesn't mean they need to retire!!!
> Long Live Rock
> Deni
>