Re: New Who, old lyrics

["L. Bird" <pkeets@hotmail.com>]

>Keets:
>
>The instrumental demo is 13 minutes long. That would indicate he had 13 
>minutes worth of things to say at the beginning of the song. As with any 
>writer, he went back and edited himself.

Again, I have to admit to ignorance.  How long is the finished version a la 
Lifehouse Chronicles?  Is that it?  What do you think he edited out?  
Lyrics?  Music?  Both, for the final WHO'S NEXT version?


> > But those three are genius, you see.  He didn't have to know how--he 
>just did it.

>Anything like proof to back that up? Or is it mere speculation?


Of course, it's speculation.  I'm in Intuitionist mode for this discussion.  
But I do have this self-indulgent notion that I can recognize genius when I 
hear it.  ;)


> > No problem.  <G>
>
>I think you're having a momentary lapse of reason.

Who?  Me?  I'm in Intuitionist mode for that discussion.  :)


2) as the esteemed Brian Cady once pointed out, Pete has virtually no chance 
of any commercial presence with a solo album, so a Who album is his only 
option on that front.

Depends, maybe.  Pete still seems to have a reasonably high profile as 
Sixties rockers go, and recent Who and website activities have raised it 
even more.  Maybe he just needs to look at his promotional opportunities a 
little more carefully.


keets


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp