RE: No

["O'Neal, Kevin W." <Kevin.ONeal@vtmednet.org>]

>I'll take a whack at interpreting the first part, but 
>what the hell does he mean here:

>>But outside a few certainties like that you plunge into subjectivity in a 
>>world in which subjectivity itself is an anachronism - a contradiction. 
>>There can be no subjectivity in a process (like pop) dedicated by its very

>>nature to objectivity, observation, compassion, identification and 
>>reflection. All executed with irony.

>>When you intercept an irony you undermine it. Criticism thus becomes
cynicism.


Art is art.  It's to be absorbed, enjoyed, and then let be.
It's like that saying......If you follow up the word "no" with a
justification, you've just undermined the strength and meaning of no.

Kevin in Vt.