Re: Pete's chatroom closing.

["L. Bird" <pkeets@hotmail.com>]

I don't think it was that particular thread, but the volume in general.  
After considering it for a while, I've decided the problem was just as Matt 
said.  The number of messages made it nearly impossible to pick out things 
that were important, and I'll bet a couple of things slipped by during the 
rehersals that upset Pete.

One very recent item that disappeared with hardly a ripple was the report of 
Roger's accident.  The Canberra concert was cancelled because of it, BTW.  
If the UK has the same news coverage as the US, Pete might well have read 
about it on the list three days late.

keets


>It's very sudden and startling. I was part of a particular thread
>which got a little out of hand but was nothing compared to some posts that 
>got a particular person banned. This thread of which I speak was just a few 
>people having fun really. no more. Some of you may have seen it.If that's 
>the reason then I have to apologise to all of you. however, I seriously 
>don't think it is as the webmaster would have surely stepped in with a 
>warning or something. There was none.
>Maybe more reasons will be given.
>regards,
>Derick.

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com