[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Progression, Magic, TED End, Chaos, Lifehouse, Disco



Aha.  I see why you were so disappointed with WAY.  You're setting up to 
do it again.  When "Lifehouse" comes out and it doesn't exactly match 
your vintage 1970's ideas, then you're going to piss and moan about how 
bad it sucks, and how Townshend can't write anything but crap and The 
Who hasn't produced anything worth sh*t since "Live at Leeds."  Right?

keets




>> Let's hope so.
>
>Why, do you LIKE inferior music???
>
>> TED will be awfully bored if they have to go on living  in 1970.  
>
>TED is a thing of the past. Although this sort of thing has been said
>before, I have a gut feeling PT will never work with the others again.
>And if Lifehouse was done best in 1970, it's stupid to change it for 
the
>sake of change. An example: while Townshend had a lot of success with 
the
>play version of TOMMY, I still think the story in the original is far
>superior.

>
>> All these songs fit with the concept of WAY without any problem.

>But none fit into the concept of Lifehouse, as described so far anyway. 
And
>DOES WAY have a concept? It was not considered a concept album at the 
time
>it came out.
>If it is, then WBN has the same concept and did it better.
>
>> Got anything against JAE?  
>
>No, I just don't think he wrote any of Lifehouse.
>
>> God, Mark, what kind of breakdown would you have if Roger wrote a 
song 
>> for the final version of "Lifehouse?"
>
>Given Daltrey's songwriting "ability," I just might have a breakdown.
>
>> it. But i don't think ALL the songs were written with "Lifehouse" in
>mind.
>> For example, "905" is an excellent song, (Most underrated Who song 
ever
>> someone here wrote recently, can't disagree although "Dangerous" is a
>close
>> second) but if it was intended as a "Lifehouse" track it changes the
>> storyline.
>
>Jeffree:
>
>Yeah, just a little bit!!!! The same is true with ALL of the WAY songs.
>
>> What do you mean?  TED might not have reached their peak yet.
>
>Keets:
>
>HA! You're SUCH an optimist!
>
>Although I will conceed that it's Rog that's the weak link at this 
point.
>Pete is a better guitarist and as good a vocalist as ever, and while 
John
>has lost his voice he's still the best bass player in the world.
>
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com