Re: Pete Speaks on Fang

["L. Bird" <pkeets@hotmail.com>]

Hmmm.  I posted about this.  Did I get censored? (Not paying attention 
again.)

It would have been rude for Pete/Matt to have blocked Fang ahead of time, 
and you can bet there would have been a furor.  Still, I do think the rules 
were made with him in mind and obviously they could depend on him to ignore 
the fact they were posted and get thrown out.  I'm hoping for a mailing list 
soon, as the forum is really awkward to deal with.  THAT likely will start 
with Fang barred in some way.

keets


>Three comments:
>
>1.	I wonder why the Chat Room (which I have not used in my several visits 
>to the site)was not set up in the first place to block this individual?  I 
>believe that I can state with some degree of certainty that they were well 
>aware of the existence of this person and his various apparent psychosises. 
>Wasn't it rather like throwing chum into a shark tank to set up a Chat Room 
>on Pete's Official site, and not expect this individual to apparently 
>bluster his way into matters?
>
>2.	Isn't hubris a terrible thing to have?

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com