Re: Richard The Headless Thomson

[Rich Niven <RNiven@prudential.com>]

Mark Leaman wrote:
> 
> >In giving him the benefit of the doubt, I have not mentioned his name to
> >them, but described the situation that he has created and refuses to stop.
> >They are VERY interested in receiving any such mail that he has sent or may
> >continue to send and will take appropriate action.
> 
> I recieved my first nasty personal EMail from him as well now. BEFORE the
> deadline, let it be noted. It seems that I insulted him by calling him a
> "censor" (actually, I didn't...just changed the subject titles a bit for my
> own amusement...as I've been known to do occasionally). Imagine that! I told
> him not to kill the messenger, for all the good it will do.
> Hey, I tried privately to help the guy "fit in," but it seems that he no
> more wants to listen than I want to obey his warnings.
> But, WF my friend, this MAY be a bit drastic. This is like blowing his head
> off. MAYBE, just maybe, he will come around on his own...we know that
> Townshend goes for realization as a goal. We should all meditate for his
> conversion to reality.
> Oooommmmm....
> 
>                    Cheers                   ML
> 
> "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity."  L. Long

Fang:

I agree with Mark, this is a little drastic.........Dragging his 
employment into this is unnecessary. Besides, if he goes away, who 
(reference) are we going to get on??

I connect here from work as well, and would rather not worry that if I 
posted something controversial, that it would somehow affect my job...