Re: Joe Jackson?? (no Who content)

[Doug Ciceri <dciceri@credit.erin.utoronto.ca>]

 Who declared emails
>or newsgroups to be champions of correct grammatical usage?

Good point.

  And, I assure
>you, there is neither sarcasm nor a double negative in the previous post.

Actually there is a double negative. Look again.
>As far as musical tastes are concerned, it's your prerogative to listen to
>whatever your heart (ear) desires, as it is mine.

Good point.

 If everyone listened to the
>same thing, we'd all be c&w fans. Listening only to the Who is not a
>prerequisite to joining this group, or is liking all the Who's material.

Good point;  I do not only listen to The Who.

 Some
>like pre-Tommy only; others think pre-Tommy is 'candy pop' so to speak. And
>many dislike any post-Moon material. The variety of musical tastes and the
>discussions it fosters is what makes this forum compelling. However, if you
>insist on proselytizing, and exercising your banality, as opposed to offering
>your own opinions and contributing to discussions, please take your routine
>elsewhere.

Personally, I find this last statement hypocritical.  First of all, you
express  your opinion and since you do not agree with mine, you suggest that
I take my routine elsewhere.  Who made you king of the dirtheep??  If I
suggest that you take your routine elsewhere, does it have anymore creedence
than what you have suggested I do.  This is low!  If you don't like the
honest comments and opinions, I think you should get a life - does everyone
have to agree with you?  I'm just as tired of your dirty laundry as you are
of mine so give it a rest and we can all breathe some 'fresher' air.

Regards.

DC
>Sincerely, and tired of airing dirty laundry,
>
>Litgo
>
>