[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Hopefully the last of...



amck, re:

>Of course you are aware that those leavings are not the ones that I am
>concerned about.

hMMM... sorry that I wasn't fooled by your genuine "concern". Unfortunately, I
happen to know you better than that...

>>For those of you scoring at home, with David Garrett's
garrett@ns1.planetc.com) announced departure on Friday, we were up to
three readers in three days needlessly lost.

Thanks for the statistics. I'm sure it's "clever" purpose was to keep the
discussions focused on The Who. Rather than be the list Gestapo agent, or now,
list "statistician", perhaps you can add your name to those who left (and
please don't forget the mellodramatic departure speech)?

In case you haven't noticed, the list is/was back to "normal" (whatever
"normal" can be defined as). Your poorly timed, ill-willed note only serves to
start more "trouble", the kind  which you "gallantly" pretend to avoid and
despise. I'm sure most of the people on this list can see right through your
"intentions" of further pot-stiring, even without me pointing it out.

Now, if you'd like to do something productive with your time, (perhaps you lack
the necessary skills, supervision or self-motivation?) go straight into Mr.
Mcauley's office Monday morning and tell him that you're tired of being a 40
year old help desk clerk and show HIM some of the "brillance" that you've
clearly demonstrated here... If you'd like to use me as a reference, I'd be
more than happy to discuss with him some examples of how you've used HIS
resources here...

Hope this helps...

-wf