[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lack of official boots
- Subject: Re: Lack of official boots
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 12:00:02 -0400
I wrote:
>However, I suspect that one of the primary reasons that boots aren't
being released is >the artists. They've worked for years to put out
"quality" work, and have little >interest in releasing what they
consider inferior material. It's quite a different >perspective from
the fans.
Then born2run wrote:
^^Well, I just have two words for you -- "Who's Last." Let's face it
^^-- artists and labels are perfectly capable of releasing crap
^^officially while letting far superior material languish in the
^^vaults.
My reply:
Dear God, I never want to imply that the way The Who's material has
been released has been good! And after MCA/Decca's release, against
the band's wishes, of "Magic Bus - The Who On Tour" and "Who's Last,"
a good case could be made that The Who's label has ripped them off
more than any bootlegger. I wonder who Pete has warmer feelings for,
the bootlegger that released his best demos as "The Genius Of Pete
Townshend" and paid him nothing, or the label that pays him, but
releases such substandard material as "Who's Last."
In all the discussion of "rights," I think it must noted that the
artist's rights have little or no bearing on what is "good" for the
artist as well as the fans. Here's just a partial list of The Who's
recordings that would have been significantly delayed or never
released, if not for the pressure of bootleggers:
The Who's studio version of "Pure and Easy"
"Naked Eye"
"Long Live Rock"
The 1971 live recording of "Bargain"
"Here 'Tis"
"Leaving Here"
"Early Morning Cold Taxi"
All Pete Townshend demos
Not only would fans have been hurt if they had never had access to
this material, but The Who's total work would have seemed much weaker
without them.
Something to think about,
Brian Cady