[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How would you do the reissues?
Received: from internet.turner.com by ccmail.turner.com with SMTP
(IMA Internet Exchange v1.04a) id 1b4f7470; Tue, 4 Jun 96 22:56:07 -0400
Received: from smap@localhost by internet.turner.com
for <Brian.Cady@turner.com> via smapdV1.3
id VAA02022; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 21:45:34 -0400
Received: from gateway.mpath.com by interlock.turner.com
for <Brian.Cady@turner.com> via SMTP (smap V1.3)
id sma001967; Tue Jun 4 21:45:08 1996
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by gateway.mpath.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA1200
3 for TheWho-outgoing; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 18:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bb.iu.net (bb.iu.net [198.69.25.2]) by gateway.mpath.com (8.7.5/8.
7.3) with SMTP id SAA11998 for <thewho@mpath.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 18:16:50 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from epresley (netport-34.iu.net [198.69.25.134]) by bb.iu.net (8.6.12/
8.6.12) with SMTP id VAA27133 for <thewho@mpath.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 21:16:03 -0
400
Message-Id: <2.2.32.19960605011542.006a72e0@iu.net>
X-Sender: epresley@iu.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sun Dec 7 14:59:06 PST 1997
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 1996 21:15:42 -0400
To: thewho@mpath.com
From: "Eddie W. Presley Jr." <epresley@iu.net>
Subject: How would you do the reissues?
Sender: owner-thewho@mpath.com
Precedence: bulk
However it's done, it won't please everyone. If I've learned one
thing from being on this list, it's that we all have very different
opinions. Still I think the best way would have been one modeled
after the Elvis Costello reissues (which several other people have
mentioned as a good model).
1. The album - followed at a decent interval by
2. Singles (A & B sides) followed by
3. All the outtakes you can fit on the disk
This is of course is not the way that Astley and Charlesworth are
doing it now. I believe from the evidence and articles that their
primary concerns are
1. Best technical sound quality from the best sounding source.
2. Creating an extended album that works best as an entire unit for
listening from start to finish.
3. Cramming on as much for collectors as possible even if it means
running the tracks together, but as long as it doesn't violate rule 2.
4. Expressing their and The Who's personal prejudices.
Of course, the primary problem with their approach is that they won't
be the one's shelling out the money for the reissues; we will. So we,
The Who fans, are the ones they should be trying to please, IMHO.
Brian Cady