Re: No Way!!!!!

[Josh Ozersky <josh_ozersky@yahoo.com>]

I said this in a personal message to anthony, but just to clear up: 
the deal I halfheartedly threw out was Walker and ALL OUR CAP ANCHORS
for Clark, Outlaw, AND MULTIPLE FIRST ROUNDERS.  It is a direction to
consider if we can't get a veteran star of value for Antoine.  I don't
want one of those Barkley for Hornacek and Tim Perry trades.





---Anthony  wrote:
>
>    Warwick Wrote:
> >I for one would be willing to make that trade, (Keon Clark, Outlaw,
and
> Pick for walker) >Outlaw is HUGE. Though you must
> >remember that Utah owns the Magic pick this year no matter what
happens...
> >Warwick
> 
> 
> 
> I really like Bo Outlaw and here are some of the things that are
positives,
> but still Walker for outlaw, Outlaw has been in the league 5yrs and
walker 2
> I'd still keep walker
> 
> Bo Outlaw:
> 1997-1998 Season
> 
> Ranked 2nd in the NBA in Field-Goal Percentage (.554)
> Ranked 10th in the NBA in Blocks Per Game (2.21)
> Ranked 6th in the NBA in Triple Doubles (1)
> 9.6 PPG
> 
> Antoine Walker:
> 
>  Ranked 5th in the NBA in Points Per Game (22.4)
>  Ranked 7th in the NBA in Rebounds Per Game (10.2)
>  Ranked 13th in the NBA in Steals Per Game (1.73)
>  Ranked 2nd in the NBA in Double Doubles (47)
>  Ranked 6th in the NBA in Triple Doubles (1)
>  Ranked 8th in the NBA in Minutes Per Game (39.9)
> 
> Well i guess that proves my point, that walker is more agile and not
worth
> losing for those 2 players......
> Look at the comparison of PPG  Walkers 22.4 opposed to Outlaws 9.6
> 
> Anthony
> 
> 
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com