Pete today on daughter Emma...and another topic



jimthewhofan at aol.com jimthewhofan at aol.com
Sun Jan 10 17:37:22 UTC 2010


 Thanks, Brian.

It does bug me, though, when editors don't insist on fact-checking.

Cincinnati was 1979. Sure, Emma may have mixed up the date, but the writer and/or editor should have caught that.

Otherwise, I very, very nice piece on the two Townshends. I'm proud of my girls, too!

 


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Cady <brianinatlanta2001 at yahoo.com>
To: oddsandsods <oddsandsods at thewho.net>; Relayers <Relayers at yahoogroups.com>; thewho at igtc.com; thewho at igtc.com
Sent: Sun, Jan 10, 2010 8:05 am
Subject: Pete today on daughter Emma...and another topic


Pete and Emma have short pieces on each other in today's The Sunday Times:
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article6979887.ece

What seems like a puff piece reveals its true purpose in paragraph six. A bold 
move on Mr. Townshend's part. Let's all cross fingers that it works.
 -Brian in Atlanta
The Who This Month!
http://www.thewhothismonth.com 


      

_______________________________________________
TheWho mailing list
TheWho at igtc.com
http://www.igtc.com/mailman/listinfo/thewho

 


More information about the TheWho mailing list