The Superbowl thing



Jim M Nakedi at comcast.net
Tue Feb 2 16:51:02 UTC 2010


-------------------------------------------------
From: <jimthewhofan at aol.com>
>
> I agree wholeheartedly with Pete's decision to ignore it. Under the rule 
> of law, which this country proclaims to value, he was not charged or 
> convicted of a crime. > The U.S. espouses that it believes in the 
> sovereignty of (most) other nations.

Just from a practical standpoint, if Pete started responding to the 
allegations, the media would start covering it more, including giving more 
exposure to the people making the claims.  Pete's response should be kept 
behind the scenes & lawyer to lawyer.

Jim M 



More information about the TheWho mailing list