Attack on Huffington Post

[Kevin and Tania O'Neal]

>Martin Bailey
>Attack on Huffington Post
>
>Allow me to explain.  I thought it was a bit annoying when Kevin started 
>doing this with the recent Grasshopper diaries too.

Well, I do apologize.
No one knew about them, or worse yet, knew yet didn't report them here.
I just happened to check Pete's site.  He had been very quiet, and 
then....BOOM!
I copied the first, and then realized there were more.  They kept coming!
It wasn't until about the 3rd one that I realized these were re-posts of 
previous interviews.
I thought at first that Pete was interviewing himself!

>It's MUCH, MUCH easier to read them directly from Pete's website.

That, too, is my fault.
I didn't have the time to separate the text of the interviewer from the 
interviewee.
And, the italics don't come across in 'plain text' format.  Also, if you 
send in "rich (html) format, it gets delayed until Paul can review it, and 
for all I know gets booted.

>But, you've got to consider this: Pete regularly changes his mind, and has 
>either taken down or altered his diaries in the past.  Particularly the 
>more >controversial (read: juicy) ones.
> So it's important for one of us to grab these diaries as soon as we can, 
> and let then live forever in the IGTC archives.  So, well done, Kevin.

Well, thanks.  When I realized these were previously published interviews, I 
did consider for a good bit if it was worth continuing to post them.
I figured that I should finish what I started.  And, it is good to have in 
the archives.

>(But you're spot-on about needing to trim the old posts in your reply, 
>though.)

Remember the days when people would regularly reply to the digest with a one 
or two line response, and copy the *entire* digest back to the list???
Man, we've come a long way!

Kevin in VT