HP PAVILLION (was RE: Who setlists)
An English Boy
peter_dennis_blandford_townshend at hotmail.com
Fri Nov 10 12:34:54 CST 2006
...and, does anyone wonder why I chose to see TRS*, Jeff Beck twice,
Ray Davies and Robin Trower rather than, for the same $, The Who->,
with this show/setlist and the disappointing reviews its received?
No, all said n done, The Hollywood Bowl show was incredible, so me mate
Nathan reported, as did all the journalist that reviewed it.
HP Pavillion= Bum _ _ _ _ California !!
Hollywood Bowl= The PLACE TO BE !!!
Gotta DVD comin' of that baby, and I truly should have attended, but
my wife's health prevented us from being that far from home....surgery
in 6 days for her...!
AEB~
>From: sroundtable at aol.com
>Reply-To: The Who Mailing List <thewho at igtc.com>
>To: thewho at igtc.com
>Subject: Who setlists
>Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:18:28 -0500
>
>I read the San Jose Mercury review of The Who's HP Pavillion show, and
>while I vehemently disagree with the author's depiction of crowds as
>"uninterested" during the new material, he made a few valid points. New
>material from an established band that released its album less than two
>weeks ago is never going to bring people to their feet or create huge roars
>of excitement. One doesn't evaluate music while jumping and yelling. The
>audience sits to take it all in. Of course, some assholes who aren't close
>followers of the band get annoyed, but fuck em. This album has been a long
>time coming, is yet another departure from prior Who albums (as most of
>them have been) and The Who should be playing a good bit of new stuff.
>
>That said, I agree wholeheartedly that stringing together three
>full-length, non-opera songs in the middle of the set is a bad move. Other
>than W&G, they ought to play no more than one new tune between the classic
>stuff. While we were all excited about hearing new live material, we were
>also told that the band would be playing some vintage Who that we haven't
>heard live in recent years. These have not been forthcoming. It would be
>much more effective to rotate the new songs (keep 3 of them in with W&G),
>and fill the openings with songs like Naked Eye, Young Man Blues, Long Live
>Rock, Relay, etc. on a rotating basis. The current setlists leave the
>casual fans a bit disappointed because there is too much new material, and
>may annoy the die-hard fans because we get only hits and new stuff with
>nothing in between. Seriously, they remove RGLB from the set and replace
>it with another new song and then play three of them in a row? Come on,
>Roger. The reviewer was right in th
> at this can really kill the momentum of a show.
>
>Mc
>________________________________________________________________________
>Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security
>tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web,
>free AOL Mail and more.
>_______________________________________________
>TheWho mailing list
>TheWho at igtc.com
>http://www.igtc.com/mailman/listinfo/thewho
_________________________________________________________________
Stay in touch with old friends and meet new ones with Windows Live Spaces
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us
More information about the TheWho
mailing list