More reviews

[Kevin and Tania O'Neal]

>Brian Cady
>More reviews
>
>This time, just the links. Like the others, they're all over the board: A 
>masterpiece, a disaster, just like >Who's Next, nothing like Who's Next, 
>first half weak, second half not as good as the first half, etc.:

Ha.  Just as well.
I started to just skim the reviews yesterday.
You can get the feel from the first and last paragraphs.
It's interesting how the reviews *are* all over the place.
But, a trend I've noticed is that the more negative reviews (have to say I 
haven't read any "disaster" reviews) have the most errors and give me the 
feel the reviewer didn't really slow down to try and understand, or isn't 
really fully familiar with The Who and Pete's work.
Overall, I'm quite satisfied with the reviews.

A question for those that were there.....
What were the reviews like for Quad or WN or WAY when they first came out?

Just trying to get some perspective.

Kevin <who fell asleep while Scott was still collecting his thoughts> in VT