Healthy discussion

[O'Neal, Kevin W.]

>Martin Bailey  
>Previous message: Healthy discussion ; absorbing the album ; 9.99 vs
13.99 ; crossing lines.... 
>
> I absolutely *LOVE* Fragments and also Fragments of Fragments.
>
>Don't get me wrong,  I love Fragments.  Nothing wrong with the lyrics
at
>all.  But FofF is just superfluous.  Pete's vocals on it are nowhere
near as
>good as Rogers (on this song).  Just seems a waste of space.

I can see what you mean by 'waste of space' (redundant?)
But, think of it in this context....
As part of the initial "administrative" part of the album (non opera),
Pete was sharing his deepest philosophy of music, fan/band relationship,
etc.

As part of the (stand alone) opera that is without a doubt in my mind an
autobiography of The Who, it is vital to include this
theory.....philosophy....
It *is* The Who.
Parts of me belong to you.
Who are you. (no question mark).
This was core to the direction The Who took in 1970/71.

>> I also picked up a Little Einsteins DVD for my kid
>
>My 3 year old daughter is well into that, too.  Great way for them to
get an
>appreciation for classical music.

Absolutely.

>Altogether now: pat, pat, pat, pat, pat, BLAST OFF!

<snicker>

>Oh, and I bought that Mojo with the Who on the cover today.

I looked for it at BB when I was there.
They didn't have it.
RATS!

Kevin in VT


Confidentiality Notice:
This message, and any attachments, may contain information that is confidential, privileged, and/or protected from disclosure under state and federal laws that deal with the privacy and security of medical information. If you received this message in error or through inappropriate means, please reply to this message to notify the Sender that the message was received by you in error, and then permanently delete this message from all storage media, without forwarding or retaining a copy.