Healthy discussion ; absorbing the album ; 9.99 vs 13.99 ; crossing lines...
JimTheWhoFan at aol.com
JimTheWhoFan at aol.com
Thu Nov 2 11:35:38 CST 2006
In a message dated 11/2/2006 11:19:34 AM Eastern Standard Time,
Kevin.ONeal at vtmednet.org writes:
My conclusion was "more of the same knee-jerk negativity."<<
I'm sorry, Kev. How about you just post a form that we can fill out when
critiquing any Who product. That way, we won't offend your obviously overly
sensitive sensibilities.
Maybe I just should have asked you first what I should say, how I should say
it.
And since you see me as little more than a contrarian, I'll be contrary here
and say that what negative remarks I have about EW are not disrespectful to
other list members. I didn't trash anyone else's pro- or con- remarks about
the album. I simply said what I felt on first listening.
You're not going to get me to apologize for it nor are you going to get me
to stop saying, in this forum, what I think.
And lastly, I think you jumped to conclusions and didn't look earnestly at
what I wrote. But that's OK.
More information about the TheWho
mailing list