Healthy discussion ; absorbing the album ; 9.99 vs 13.99 ; crossing lines...



JimTheWhoFan at aol.com JimTheWhoFan at aol.com
Thu Nov 2 11:35:38 CST 2006


In a message dated 11/2/2006 11:19:34 AM Eastern Standard Time,  
Kevin.ONeal at vtmednet.org writes:

My  conclusion was "more of the same knee-jerk  negativity."<<
 
I'm sorry, Kev. How about you just post a form that we can fill out when  
critiquing any Who product. That way, we won't offend your obviously overly  
sensitive sensibilities.
 
Maybe I just should have asked you first what I should say, how I should  say 
it.
 
And since you see me as little more than a contrarian, I'll be contrary  here 
and say that what negative remarks I have about EW are not disrespectful to  
other list members. I didn't trash anyone else's pro- or con- remarks about 
the  album. I simply said what I felt on first listening.
 
You're not going to get me to apologize for it nor are you going to get me  
to stop saying, in this forum, what I think. 
 
And lastly, I think you jumped to conclusions and didn't look earnestly at  
what I wrote. But that's OK. 

 



More information about the TheWho mailing list