Criticism Debate

[L. Bird]

>No, Keets.  Calling yourself a "news service" is arrogant.

Is it?  Okay, maybe it's a spam service, but at least it's on topic.


>>Of course, I guess your question is whether Who news should be considered 
>>spam?

>Absolutely, positively ,100% incorrect.  Pay attention.

That's rude.


>It took ONE MINUTE of searching to determine that the article you posted 
>did
not, in fact, actually exist.  This phoney article is spam because SOMEBODY
MADE IT UP AND TRIED TO SPREAD IT AROUND THE INTERNET.  That is the very
definition of spam and YOU FACILITATED IT.

But not without a question mark.  Sorry if you were misled by the lack of 
extended disclaimer, but I don't always have much time to devote.


>Apparently this list not only endorses that, but bans members for calling 
>attention to it.

No, for smarting off to the list owner.  Paul is providing a free service, 
too.


keets