Roger and the Rich List



TJLY99 at aol.com TJLY99 at aol.com
Fri Mar 11 21:32:01 CST 2005


In a message dated 3/11/2005 10:30:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
TJLY99 at aol.com writes:

> 
> In a message dated 3/11/2005 8:47:29 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
> pkeets at hotmail.com writes:
> 
> >
> >
> >>Here's the list:
> >>>
> >>>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/section/0%2C%2C2108%2C00.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>what list is roger on?
> >
> >None of them, it looks like.  In 2000 (I think it was) Roger and Pete both 
> >appeared on the list because of the big Who tour that year.  First Roger 
> >dropped off and now Pete is gone, too.  I believe the list cuts off below 
> >20M pounds.  This must be what generated Roger's comment about Keith Moon 
> >and The Who.
> >
> >Actually the list is based on an estimate, so you wonder why The Times (or 
> >whoever makes up the list) thinks Roger and Pete's fortunes have declined.  
> 
> >I'd say Pete makes a ton of money through sales of his songs (to CSI) 
> that's 
> >
> >not immediately obvious.
> >
> >
> >keets
> >
> >i found this list below..it has paul mccartney, mick jagger, keith richards 
> 
> >etc..thats why i asked what number roger is.
> >
> 
> Sunday Times - Rich List 
> _______________________________________________
> thewho mailing list
> thewho at igtc.com
> http://www.igtc.com/mailman/listinfo/thewho
> 

oh i got what you mean now sorry   :)



More information about the TheWho mailing list