schrade at akrobiz.com
Sat Nov 20 12:57:58 CST 2004
> Do I really *need* to go out and get this, or can I be reasonably happy
> without them, and listen to studio EF?
No, the live EF from the IH reissue isn't a "must have," but you were asking,
I believe, which live version of EF was the best - & that would be the bonus
live version on the IH reissue. The ball's in your court now.
> overall it's disappointing right from the ra-tat-a-tat, tat-a-tat of Kenney's
> lame opening salvo to Pete's whiny guitar solos.
EF has never been one of my all-time favorite Who songs but I don't mind
this live version at all.
> Frankly, the studio version of the song blows the live version away.
The studio version has a darker, more ominous feel than any live version,
that's for sure.
> What the hell is Kenney doing? Did someone steal his kit and leave him
> with only a snare?
Hmmm.....I hear a bass drum, a hi-hat, & cymbals, also. Perhaps your ears
are clogged like Rabbit's. Besides, the song calls for a stark approach on
drums - much like Moon's approach on "905" from the WAY album.
Kenney is just playing to the song. "The Quiet One," on the other hand,
doesn't require a stark approach, & Kenney delivers.
> Oh, and why do they chop off the start of the synth intro when they play
> it live?
Good question. It's really just a cue for the keyboards, isn't it? Maybe be-
cause it's a bit long. (?) And on a related topic, the synth intro is left in
for the live version of WAY, even though it is absent on the studio version.
> Hey, this could be a good thread. Who songs that are better on albums
> than live.
"Magic Bus" comes instantly to mind. The live version can be OK, but it's
like a completely different song, isn't it? It has none of the coolness of the
- SCHRADE in Akron
More information about the TheWho