tetrakarbon at hotmail.com
Sun Jun 13 12:25:36 CDT 2004
>Are you kidding? Freud's antiquated theories are mostly laughed at by
I don't pretend to be an expert on this, but isn't the basis of his
conclusions - the analysis of dreams, and such - still respected? I'm not
saying that his conclusions are necessarily still in vogue, but his premises
I think still hold some weight. Not a physchologist, but somewhat
interested in it.
>Who's done more to explain the universe?
>Spiritual philosophers or scientists? Give me a break.
They explain different aspects, why even compare them? Both seem important
enough. It's like asking "Who's explained more about the universe, physics
majors or english majors?" It's not a contest... In terms of "The Seeker",
I feel pretty certain Pete's talking about philosophical (not necessarily
spiritual) understanding, not the minutia of quantum physics. The two
fields answer completely different questions: "How?" and "Why?".
-- Ned Ruggeri
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee®
More information about the TheWho