Marcus Surrealius bushchoked at
Tue Aug 17 08:03:08 CDT 2004

> But without Roger there would not have been a Who.
IMO it was Roger who
literally "Willed" the band to success in the early
days.  I love John but
it was Roger who had the vision.


Doesn't matter. And Roger "willed" it so much he got
his ass kicked out of the band in 1965.
There MIGHT have been a Who without Rog. It would have
been a different band. More likely Pete would have
formed another band. I do believe that had the band
broken up just prior to Tommy, they could have
released the Tommy demos (tarted up a bit) as an
album. THAT would have been an interesting turn of

"We must have the attitude that every child in
America-regardless of where they're raised or how
they're born-can learn."
      George "misunderestimated" Bush

Cheers         ML

Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! 

More information about the TheWho mailing list