Atlanta

[Pereira, Jorge M]

Well, thanks for understanding.  I feel a lot better now.

jorge

-----Original Message-----
From: celtics-bounces at igtc.com [mailto:celtics-bounces at igtc.com] On
Behalf Of Kim Malo
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 6:52 PM
To: The Boston Celtics Mailing List; The Boston Celtics Mailing List
Subject: Re: Atlanta

At 03:58 PM 5/1/2008, Pereira, Jorge M wrote:
>Kim,
>
>First, I said "miniscule" because TA is not in Doc's plans and by
>harping on TA I'm really taking up the list's time for a miniscule
issue
>and I was apologizing for that.

Whatever.

>It was not directed at anyone.  2nd,
>some people (you've voiced it) think TA is not ready

No I didn't "voice it". Read what I actually said, not what you want 
me to have said to suit your agenda.

I said nothing about his not being ready That's a different category 
of problem and makes assumptions about him I'm not making and did not 
say. I said he's thoroughly earned his place on the bench this time 
despite being given a bunch of opportunities. I did also say I'd have 
tried him on JJ regardless, but of course that doesn't suit your 
apparent agenda either. I didn't actually state the corollary issue 
with playing him regardless of his recent play, that you try to 
minimize risks even more during the playoffs than during the regular 
season, because I thought that was a given, but if it needs to be 
stated I just have.

>  and others (me
>included) think he's not used enough and correctly, nothing else.  Doc
>pulling him at that time was atrocious; there is no sarcasm on that,
>just a way to get my point across.

Whatever.

>But really, the TA issue goes a lot deeper.  It is really not about TA.

Whatever.
I was simply answering a point made about TA, so yes, that was about 
TA no matter how many times you try to turn it into 20 other things.

Kim 

_______________________________________________
The Boston Celtics Mailing List
celtics at igtc.com
http://www.igtc.com/mailman/listinfo/celtics