Long Celtics article

[Ryan W]

At the beginning of the season, it wasn't
bullshit--nothing had been proven then.  Now,
approximately 3/4ths of the way through the season,
after posting the best record in the league and
surviving a KG injury, it's a bullshit criticism and a
product of not thinking.  And from a journalist who
otherwise provided a fresh look at the C's, I think it
was a majoy cop-out to end his article with a tired
and lame criticism.  Fans often know better--when
they're watching all the games. 

Ryan
--- JoeFan11111 at aol.com wrote:

> 
> In a message dated 3/1/08 10:11:42 PM,
> ubiquitous_am_i at yahoo.com writes:
> 
> > He is, except at the end of the article where he
> > repeats the tired criticism that we have no talent
> > beyond the Big Three.  He's too good to repeat
> that
> > bullshit. 
> > 
> Just playing Devil's advocate here, but why is it
> bullshit when 
> so many NBA gurus have shared the same thought?   
> 
> Are we active fans really so right and the experts
> really so wrong?
> 
> Just wondering, 
> Joe
> 
> 
> **************
> Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL
> Living.
>      
>  
>
(http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
> _______________________________________________
> The Boston Celtics Mailing List
> celtics at igtc.com
> http://www.igtc.com/mailman/listinfo/celtics
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ