No news is good news?

[douglas342 at aol.com]

Steve was right when he said the initial release was "at least 2-3 weeks.
 
As for me, I'm in no hurry to rush Paul back.  This team is going nowhere this year and there are some players getting valuable experience.  Given the weak Atlantic, the Cs might sneak into the playoffs and lose out in the first round, but so what?  And it might be a luxury to allow a player to take the time to heal thoroughly for a change.
 
Would they have won some of these games without him?  Most likely.  Amazingly, though, I'm not sure that it matters. 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick.Ryan at westover.af.mil
To: celtics at igtc.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 5:39 AM
Subject: No news is good news?


Anyone have the latest on Pierce's return to duty?  I haven't had access to
any papers or anything for a week or so and have no idea the expected return
of Pierce.  Are we still a ways out?  Days? Weeks?  Despite some documented
differences of opinion on playing style he still would have meant the
difference in winning and losing over this past ten game stretch to this
Celtics team.

 

Any news would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

_______________________________________________
The Boston Celtics Mailing List
celtics at igtc.com
http://www.igtc.com/mailman/listinfo/celtics
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL.  Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.