No news is good news?

[Jeff White]

To have come out and said Pierce would be out only two weeks -- as the C's
did, if memory serves -- was ridiculous.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Berry, Mark S" <berrym at BATTELLE.ORG>
To: "The Boston Celtics Mailing List" <celtics at igtc.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:19 AM
Subject: RE: No news is good news?


> He's supposed to be reevaluated this week. They're being pretty vague.
> The earliest date I've seen actually mentioned is the 19th, and that
> sounds optimistic at this point.
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: celtics-bounces at igtc.com [mailto:celtics-bounces at igtc.com] On
> Behalf Of Ryan, Patrick S Maj RES USAFR 439 MSG
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 8:40 AM
> To: celtics at igtc.com
> Subject: No news is good news?
>
> Anyone have the latest on Pierce's return to duty?  I haven't had access
> to
> any papers or anything for a week or so and have no idea the expected
> return
> of Pierce.  Are we still a ways out?  Days? Weeks?  Despite some
> documented
> differences of opinion on playing style he still would have meant the
> difference in winning and losing over this past ten game stretch to this
> Celtics team.
>
>
>
> Any news would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Boston Celtics Mailing List
> celtics at igtc.com
> http://www.igtc.com/mailman/listinfo/celtics
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Boston Celtics Mailing List
> celtics at igtc.com
> http://www.igtc.com/mailman/listinfo/celtics