Half full, half empty ...

[Sean Giovanello]

Well, thats one clear example.  Is it possible to find clear evidence of
others?  Well, when we did use some of the midlevel it was for Veal and Dick
instead of Earl Watson or Juwan Howard or any number of other guys.
However, that could just be Danny sucking.  We also have not gone into tax
land, which means no major deals to take on salary.  I guess when you look
at the time they have owned the team and see the clear absence of any
committment to take on salary rather than make revenue neutral or revenue
positive deals, you could draw some conclusions BUT that would require you
to put down the kool aid :P

On 2/1/07, Peter Delevett <pdelevett at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Do you mean, three+ years ago? Gosh, I guess that is
> incontrovertible proof that we have tight-fisted
> owners who aren't dedicated to winning. Damn them all.
>
>
> >>In regards to the cash stuff, they specifically did
> not use the midlevel when the owners first took over
> because it would put them into tax land and Wyc said
> no way.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
> (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
> http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Boston Celtics Mailing List
> celtics at igtc.com
> http://www.igtc.com/mailman/listinfo/celtics
>