C's trade???
Piotrowski, Mark A
mark.a.piotrowski at sfcc.edu
Fri Oct 13 12:29:05 CDT 2006
* thanks to Ellie for clearing up that there really weren't any "good bet"
bigs available with the #7 pick
-- we could have taken a chance on Saer Sene or Patrick O'Bryant but other
than that there were a
bunch of career 8th men IMO. The only 2 guys I think we legitimately might
rue not taking with the 7th
are Brandon Roy and Rudy Gay. But we're so stocked at those positions i think
the trade was still a
good one (esp. b/c we got Ratliff and lost a year of Raef's deal and a 2nd
rounder).
* on the Jackson deal -- I agree that probably this is one of those "nothing
to lose" deals.
On the other hand, I think that even before getting Jackson we have to do
something to find mins for
our 2/3's. Assuming that Rondo and Telfair split the mins at the PG spot
(maybe West gets 10 mpg
there), Doc has 96 mins/gm for
Pierce
Szczerbiak
West
Allen
Green
I think a natural trading partner would be Denver --- they're (still) looking
for scoring help at the 2 and
have 8 bigs (Kenyon Martin, Camby, Nene, Joe Smith, Kleiza, Reggie Evans,
Najera & Jamal Sampson).
They have $35 million tied up in 3 of them: Martin, Nene and Camby.
A deal of Szczerbiak, Tony Allen and Scalabrine (or Grant's Salary) for Camby
and Najera would be great
IMO.
Denver gets an all-star outside shooter to open things up for Carmelo and the
bigs and we get Camby,
a terrific shotblocker and rebounder who tends to get banged up.
our lineup would be much more settled (or would in the hands of a coach who
understood such things)
and we'd have a lot of depth:
Telfair / West / Pierce / Jefferson / Camby
Perkins
Gomes
Green
Rondo
Najera
Ratliff
(the other) mark
----------------------------
Probably a good risk considering the writing was on the wall with Jones.
Danny is cashing in a guy he was going to cut anyway for a former
lottery pick, hoping he can rediscover the form that made him a lottery
pick in the first place. Of course, he was atrocious with Cleveland.
Absolutely atrocious.
But if Danny makes this trade with the intention of keeping Jackson,
that complicates things. Jones was getting cut in favor of Olowokandi.
That was becoming clear. But now you add a guy at a position where
they're already overloaded. Who goes?
PGs: Telfair, Rondo, West
SG/SFs: Pierce, Wally, Allen, West, Green, Ray, Jackson
PFs: Jefferson, Gomes, Scalabrine
Cs: Ratliff, Perk, Kandi
That's 16. Someone has to go. Does it come down to a direct competition
between Ray and Jackson for that final spot? And this isn't considering
Powe or Pittsnoggle, who I'm assuming are history.
Could it be a precursor to another move that ships out some 2/3s to add
a big?
Mark
More information about the celtics
mailing list