Pierce trade?

[Sean Giovanello]

On the one hand people dont want to trade Pierce cause of his value to the
team and on the other people say he bring back anything even remotely
resembling a top-tier player.

On 5/24/06, Steve Ouellette <bosox18 at charter.net> wrote:
>
> First of all, NO MORE PIERCE TRADES! :-)
>
> And I don't know if Colangelo would trade Bosh for Pierce straight up. He
> certainly wouldn't toss Villanueva in.
>
> Steve O
>
> ---- keltsfan <keltsfan at comcast.net> wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > If Marcus Williams continues to impress in workouts, Atlanta, who is
> > desperate for a pure point guard, may take him that high so I can see
> the
> > logic behind this mock. Thomas might fall to Boston in such a scenario.
> >
> > I'm not sure Toronto takes Aldridge. They are building around Bosh and
> > Aldridge seems redundant.  Perhaps Toronto trades down.  Now if
> Colangelo
> > believes Aldridge can become Bosh rather quickly, perhaps a re-signed
> Bosh
> > and Villenueva and cap fodder could be had for Pierce?
> >
> > Ravi
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: celtics-bounces at igtc.com
> > > [mailto:celtics-bounces at igtc.com] On Behalf Of Piotrowski, Mark A
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 10:12 AM
> > > To: celtics at igtc.com
> > > Subject:
> > >
> > > this brings up an intersesting point.
> > >
> > > draftexpress has Tyrus Thomas falling to us -- in a scenario
> > > that's not too outside the realm of
> > > possibility:
> > >
> > > [http://draftexpress.com/viewarticle.php?a=1310]
> > >
> > > 1. Tor: aldridge
> > > 2. CHI: Bargnani
> > > 3. CHA: Morison
> > > 4. POR: Roy
> > > 5. ATL: Marcus Williams (i think they'd go for T Thomas but
> > > M. Williams also makes sense) 6. MIN: Gay 7. BOS: Thomas
> > >
> > > Ellie -- as a past Usenet Mockdraft GM :) -- woudl you take
> > > Thomas over, say Carney, OBryant, et al.
> > >
> > > (the other) mark
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > > like Parish, too.  And these are not guys available at #7 for
> > > the most part (esp. now with the age restriction). If you're
> > > not in the top 3-4, your best bet for big men is to let some
> > > other team do the 2-4 year development phase with them, then
> > > aquire them via trade/FA, or 'grass is greener' philosophy.
> > >
> > > Ellie
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > The Boston Celtics Mailing List
> > > celtics at igtc.com
> > > http://www.igtc.com/mailman/listinfo/celtics
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > The Boston Celtics Mailing List
> > celtics at igtc.com
> > http://www.igtc.com/mailman/listinfo/celtics
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Boston Celtics Mailing List
> celtics at igtc.com
> http://www.igtc.com/mailman/listinfo/celtics
>