Celts will finally play some suffocating D!

[Steve Ouellette]

I don't seen any way, any situation, where Iverson is a better option 
than Garnett. The problem is that Garnett probably isn't available, and 
Iverson is the best superstar who is available in trade.

I'm still underwhelmed the morning after. I would have much rather 
stayed at No. 7 and taken Gay or Roy, especially if we were going to nab 
Rondo (don't mind giving up a late 2007 pick for him) later in the 
draft. Now if we trade for Iverson, we can have three 6-0 and under 
point guards! Woo hoo!

Save Delonte Now!

Steve O

Darrell Hatfield wrote:

>Loooong time lurker yelling out, then crawling back to my hole....
>
>To me, Ainge is looking at the direction of the NBA...and a penetrating
>guard who gets to the line is worth far more than a Garnett or an O'Neal
>at this time.  5 years from now, maybe not.  But I feel this is a last
>ditch attempt to get Pierce to the Finals in the next few years...and the
>fastest way is with someone who fits the rules of the game today (Iverson)
>vs. the rules of yesterday (Garnett)
>
>
>  
>
>  
>


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.6/378 - Release Date: 6/28/2006