perk stats

[steve knight]

you might also want to factor in that perk was doing
it against starters last year, subs the year before.
in that light, his stats are a bit more impressive
than simply doubling with twice the minutes.  


Message: 9
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 10:20:38 EDT
From: Eggcentric at aol.com
Subject: Double minutes, double stats
To: celtics at igtc.com
Message-ID: <4c1.2e90ec.31b44636 at aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

With Jeff's disappointing sophomore year and Allen's
little off-court "F him over" directive while crushing
some guy's eye socket ("I made a little mistake and
used
bad judgment"), good guy Perkins seems to have risen 
to the top of our future stars list, even ahead of
gasp, 
wheeze... the incomparable Delonte.

< We have the living, breathing example that you can
work miracles
with touch in one offseason with Perk. Yes he still
clangs a few
(I think part of the issue with him is getting used to
controlling his
new, stronger body), but compare his shooting first
two seasons
to last season and he clearly added major touch to his
shot over
the summer. It's a jaw dropping difference. > -Kim

It appeared to me as well that Perk had really
improved his
offense this past season.   Yet when comparing his
2004-05
production/stats to those of 2005-06, I must admit to
not 
seeing the ?jaw dropping difference?

Aside from an increased FG% from 47.1 to 51.5
(although both 
were down from his rookie season of 53.3%), a quick
peek at 
his progress reveals little more than double minutes
for
basically double stats.

2004-05          (2005-06)

Min. 9.1           (19.6)
PPG 2.5            (5.2)
FT% 63.8           (61.5)
R's 2.9             (5.9)
A's 0.4             (1.0)
To's 0.7           (1.6)
St's   0.2           (0.3)
Blk's 0.6           (1.5)
PF's 1.6                (2.9)


Egg

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com