ode to joe
HRBlaine at aol.com
HRBlaine at aol.com
Mon Dec 4 15:09:09 CST 2006
In a message dated 12/4/2006 3:36:45 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, Gene
writes:
>Lastly, while I do see positives from Scal, he is not the difference maker
that Powe could be. Look at what my man Millsap (Jazz) is doing with 16
minutes a game; Powe has more >offense than Millsap and as much hustle and
rebounding zeal if not the physical bulk. Yet, we are trying to win now and so
Powe and Green will get only spot minutes, if that.
I think Doc has explained that. Scal is doing better in practice than Powe.
When you sit the better guy, why should anybody practice hard if they
think the coach is just going to play his favorites. And what coach in his right
mind would play a guy based on "someday"? If he does, he's playing
favorites. When Powe starts beating Scal in practice maybe we'll see more of him.
I'm no apologist for Doc but seriously, that's the right way to coach. A
player has to earn his minutes, not just be given them.
Harry
anyway, powe sucks, but of course he *could be* great lol
More information about the celtics
mailing list