RE: Legality of Pete's research

["Citizen Kane" <rosebud905@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> >It definitely would be a miscarriage of justice if Pete carried out his
> research after being assured it was legal, and then was arrested after the
> law changed.
>
> Kind of how it's a total miscarriage of facts to imply the above?
> Yeah, right, Pete did his "research" *after* being assured it was legal.
> Sure didn't take you long to again start fabricating reality.

"Would be," Kevin, not "is."  There is no statement of fact in the above, or 
any intent to miscarry the same.

Perhaps you could provide us with a reasonable explanation as to why Pete 
keeps saying this?


keets

P.S.  Why are you fabricating reality?

_________________________________________________________________
Working moms: Find helpful tips here on managing kids, home, work   and 
yourself.   http://special.msn.com/msnbc/workingmom.armx