Sticking to the facts......

["O'Neal, Kevin W." <Kevin.ONeal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>From: "L. Bird" <pkeets@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: Pete's person
>
>I'm not sure where you're getting that "repeatedly," Kevin.  As I recall, 
>Pete said he blundered into one accidently, then Joseph found one, and then 
>Pete paid to enter Landslide once and looked at three or four sites FROM THE 
>OUTSIDE.  I'm not too clear about whether the sites he looked at were inside 
>Landsllide or not, but he does say FROM THE OUTSIDE.

Setting the record straight:
Time Magazine Quotes Pete as saying..."I've entered child porn sites on 3 or 4 occasions total, and used my credit card once."

Hey, that's not me saying that, that's Pete.

I believe this was from his very initial press statement when the story first broke.
Ken, can you verify that?

No where do I see "FROM THE OUTSIDE" in anything Pete's stated.
And really, that's pretty much just splitting hairs.

>The accidents don't count.  So you've got one offense and three of four 
>looks from the outside.  That could all be one session at the computer and 
>would take maybe fifteen minutes.

Keets, I've only ever quoted what Pete has stated.
It is his quote.
You seem to be speculating to try and lessen the impact in your mind.
Let's stay with the facts on this.

The words Pete used were "entered", "3 or 4 *occasions* total".
The rest of what you've written is speculation and inference.

If I'm wrong, I want to see it.
Really.

>Sounds 
>like, regardless of the tabloids, Pete has passed muster with the public.  
>:)

Tabloids????
You're obviously not reading all the articles against Pete that have been posted even on this very list.

Keets, I don't have a problem at all if you want to continue to live in a state of denial, but I am starting to object to you painting the issue through rose colored glasses.
You're not being impartial, and it is confusing the issue.

Just my HO.

Kevin in VT