[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the Mall analogy
In a message dated 5/12/2003 12:36:17 PM Eastern Standard Time,
seahawkman2001@yahoo.com writes:
> On the demand end, paying the
> keepers of the Mall is also inciting the distribution
> of child abuse images... and in turn inciting the
> further abuse of children.
True. That is why Pete admitted an "offense." He never denied that he did
it.
The thing that clearly separates Pete from Thomas and Janice Reedy -by the
span of an entire universe, give or take a galaxy or two- is the *reason* for
doing what they did.
That is why I am a firm supporter of Pete in this and why I agree that he has
every right to be pissed. I don't need an apology from someone who has
outdone all of us put together with regard to the plight of suffering
victims.
Jon in Mi.