[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Woke up Free but Branded by his Fans Too?



----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin O'Neal"
> Hold on there Jimbo M.......before you make more outlandish accusations
that
> you don't know anything about..
> If you want to equate what Pete did, who is now on a public register of
sex
> offenders and likely unable to travel, with casual pot smokers accross the
> world numbering in the millions, that's up to you if you wish to hide like
> that.
> But, don't for a second state that I am giving money to anyone.  I'm not.
> So careful with your written accusations there bucko.  I don't take them
> lightly, and you don't know what you're talking about.

That's true, "I ain't got a clue 'bout the things that you do...", but I was
referring to your own statement, "The purchase of a substance for your
personal use, that harms no one other
than your self (wait, I'm harshing out......give me a
sec.........................................................................
.......................................CACK!......................ok, I'm
back), vs. the purchase of a substance for your personal use where innocent
children have been directly harmed."  I don't think it's too much of a leap
to say it sounds like you're saying you occaisionally purchase
marajuana for personal consumption.  If you've *never* paid money for
something that you were pretty sure was was going to some thug somewhere,
*not even once*, then great, you're lilly white.  Is that what you're
saying, Saint Kevin? Because, that's the standard you're holding Pete to.

> >Have any of you people slamming Pete ever looked at porn on the internet?
>
> Legal vs. Illegal.
> And we're talking about Pete, here.
> Too uncomfortable for you?

Pete's legal issue has been dealt with by the legal authorities.  We've, no
*you've*, crossed over into moral condemnation.  That's nothing to do with
the law.  That's what makes me uncomfortable, Kevvie-poo.

Jim M