Re: New Pete diary

["Jim M" <petenotped@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message ----- From: "O'Neal, Kevin W."

> Because I don't for a moment believe that Pete made the above apology
because of what Scott,
> Ken, I, or anyone else has written, I can only sit back content in the
knowledge that Pete felt this
> was the right thing to do.  Just like some of us did.

I was never against an apology.  I was against making it a condition of
giving Pete support.

> Notice how much calmer Pete is?

Among others.

> But I tell ya, strange little development with the law having changed
after the fact, and Pete being
> held to it retroactively.  I'm not doubting Pete for a moment, but what a
strange twist.