Re: IWF

[Keithjmoon70@xxxxxxx]

In a message dated 1/31/03 12:17:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
seahawkman2001@yahoo.com writes:

> In this case they come across more as hypocrites. 
> They urge the public to report illegal content, but
> their actions appear to be that they may then condemn
> you publically before you are charged with a crime
> much less proven guilty.  Oh, and they won't bother
> checking to corroborate your claim to have contacted
> them in good faith before they join in the press
> witch-hunt. But yes, by all means, trust us when you
> report.
> 
> The really fucked-up thing about the police/press leak
> of suspects in Operation Ore, and then groups like IWF
> joining in the feeding frenzy, is that all the
> THOUSANDS of real pedophiles whose names are on the
> list are given plenty of advance warning to destroy
> their hard drives.  If it all had been kept
> confidential, as I'm sure UK law proscribes, the
> authorities could have apprehended far more real
> criminals and saved far more real victims than through
> this travesty.
> 
> 

I really enjoyed this, Ken.  Plain old common sense.  That will make a great 
complaint letter for when the hard evidence arrives and we attack they asses.

Jon in Mi.