Re: Re. gun-shy but willing to wield a torch

["L. Bird" <pkeets@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Is is me, or does it sound like Pete was keenly aware of the fine line,
> and how to avoid legally tripping over it?
>
> I'd be very interested in knowing the contents of those E-mails to the IWF.
I would say that his lawyer gave him very good advice about what to do and 
what not to do.  As long as there was no liklihood that the card number 
would be found, then the advice was "Dear, Pete.  Shut up."  As a celebrity, 
Pete is likely too big a fish to preserve the anonymity that the US guy has 
managed to achieve--plus, the climate for this sort of thing is very 
different in the UK.

After the investigation was underway, then I'm sure they were thinking ahead 
to what might happen.  Still, regardless of whether Pete has attempted to 
cover his tracks, I believe what he says about his reasons for being on the 
site, and what his reactions were.  For one thing, he knew what he had done 
was illegal, and he apparently consulted with his lawyer right away.  That's 
not something a pedophile would do.

keets

_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail