Things will out. It will be highly interesting to see
what IWF and Mark Stephens in particular say, if
anything. They may hide behind their confidentiality
language. I've been poking around and there is some
interesting elements - such as they're funded by the
telecoms and ISPs in the UK. In fact they are
soliciting comments on a revision to their
constitution and "remit" which I gather is Brit-speak
for charter or mission.
I suppose Ken has found this already, but there is info on the site about
the IWF organization. Like Kevin, I was mostly curious, as I'm getting the
vibe that these organizations are so constrained by their creed (and the
laws) that they can't accomplish a whole lot. That would mean they're sort
of over-sensitive and prone to prosetylizing. There were a couple of other
similar organizations that checked in early on with about the same attitude
as IWF, i.e. "You look, you're going to jail!"