[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Yeah, what *is* the problem?



Hi,

Just my 2 EuroCents of this whole pointless discussion. (oh yeah, Bjorn is 
getting involved, whooo-hooo)

This whole thing is just wrong and nasty. People aren't listening to each 
other and the same arguments keep flying over and back (just in a different 
way). Discussion gets heated, and you have two people disagreeing on 
something they don't even have control over in the first place.

Paul, I am all for closing threads if they go too far, if that's possible.

Kevin, I don't know you, but you're yelling and cursing at my friend here 
in public. Why not just let somebody have his opinion without calling him 
retarded... If you can't stand the guy, just filter him out of your mailbox.

Jeff, get your ass back here.

Whatever happened to all that lovely hippie shit? (I guess someone flushed 
the toilet)

Bjorn

At 20:55 6-3-02 -0500, Kev wrote:

>In a message dated 03/06/2002 3:55:26 AM Central Standard Time,
>TheWho-Digest-Owner@igtc.com writes:
>
>
> > Kevin,
> > You got that right.
> > Mc came sniffing around my inbox, looking for an explanation and apology.
> >
> > I did not apologize, but did explain my problem.
> > No problem with his opinio, but ignorance and stupidity get under my skin.
> >
> > Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee :-D
> >
> > Jeff
> >
>
>You make yourself look retarded when you can't comprehend a simple point
>about the unique nature of what ticket brokers do in comparison to other
>industries and the inherent abuse that average concert goers take because of
>it, then use a conviluted definition of "retailer" and "wholesaler" in some
>weak attempt to make me look stupid and ignorant to people on this list.
>Amazingly you have not demonstrated in any way what was stupid or ignorant
>about my opinion, other than it differs from yours.  I even posted again with
>the Webster's definition of "wholesaler" to illustrate my point.  I'm not
>going to re-hash the argument because I'm tired of it, but to air what I
>wrote to you off list to everyone else is obvious "douche-baggery" on your
>part.  The whole reason I e-mailed u privately is because I was done with the
>argument, but wanted to know exactly why you attacked so viciously with no
>provocation.  I just accepted your apology off-list, but now that I've read
>the list I'm fucking pissed off (i realize that you don't give a shit- but
>I'm writing it anyway).  I'm still not sure why you have taken such extra
>measures to cut me down and humiliate me on the list, when u and I have had
>no previous conflict.  But to apologize off-list after posting the above is
>pretty reprehensible.  I was torn to shreds for one post a few months ago of
>the same nature as yours, and by you, i believe- then you turn around and do
>something 3X worse.  By the way- i was not fishing for an apology, DICKHEAD,
>i just wasn't understanding the hostility regarding a debate on the
>legitimacy of brokers, so GO TO HELL!
>
>kevin Mc
>
>PS- ur also a god damn liar after saying you did not apologize:
>
>"I am sorry I insulted you on the list.  I got carried away."
>
>Jeff