Re: Are the Who important?

["L. Bird" <pkeets@hotmail.com>]

>The few responses I have read to date seem to interpret this word as 
>historical significance.  Perhaps.  Unfortunately, one must further narrow 
>down the definition as musically historic, or as a brief nod in regards to 
>a descriptive  synopsis of our youth culture in the late '60s.  I will 
>leave the anthropologists of the world to answer that question.

I'm not sure how the original poster meant the question, as he didn't 
elaborate, but I tend to think he meant within a broader perspective.

>I would be rather curious as to WHY the Who are important to each 
>individual.

Now that's likely to be complex.  ;)


keets