[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Beatles Who and Scooby Doo
>Would The Who, or any of the "British Invasion" bands really have happened
in such a massive way if there'd been NO Beatles kicking down some doors and
if it'd had been, say for example, the Beach Boys instead? WHO KNOWS??
Let's not get twisted about this, let's be grateful for what we've had /got!
The Beatles definitely opened the doors of opportunity for British bands in
the US. I'd bet their managers set up the reception (the screaming girls
and the hype), but it caught on, and a procession of bands followed that got
the same reception. It didn't really matter who they were or what they
played, they got a chance, and it was a while before it sorted out who had
staying power and who didn't.
The Beatles and The Rolling Stones appeared to take an early lead as far as
being contenders went, likely because they were able to modify their style
to appeal to young men as well as teenage girls, and to create something
beyond that first bubble-gum pop that got them in. The Beatles were always
favored by moms as the cuter and more wholesome, and it was something of a
shock to find later that they were drug users as much as the RS. If you'll
check around, Paul McCartney still has that squeaky-clean image, regardless
of intervening time and events.
The Who brought up the rear guard of the British Invasion, arriving fairly
late on the Smothers Brothers Show and then dropping pretty much out of
sight until Woodstock, where they suddenly launched into music history. It
was the Seventies Who that captured the US, not the power-pop Sixties
version.
keets
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp