[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Final report on LALD sound quality
> > Hmmm.....wonder why the horrible sound quality people talk about on
> > other lists isn't being heard by the general public. Hmmm.....that's
> > interesting.
> I guess it tells you what kind of stereo they're listening with,
D'oh! See, Mark - all your problems would be solved if you bought a
*mid-priced* stereo system & got rid of that fancy-shmancy one you have!
> and how little they care about sound quality.
Boo! Boo! Sweeping generalization! Sweeping generalization! Boo!
> As for me, I got a CD player because
> it was reportedly the best possible sound quality.
Are you saying you.....got fooled again?
> So my desire is obvious.
Jail time for Jon Astley? A fine for Pete?
> Speaking of which, since my computer has been so tied up with making CDs for
> trades, I hauled out my DBX unit
Which stands for: Don't Buy! X-spensive!
> and played LALDE: Tommy on it. Expanding
> the sound doesn't help.
What about some superior smoke? Have you tried that? Still nothing?
> The hollowness is still there. So I guess this is
> just what we're going to have to settle for.
And most of the public is settling for it just fine.
> And it's ABOUT TIME some bombs started falling! However, if Taliban claims
> that bin Laden wasn't in the bag beforehand are true, then Bush screwed up
> as I expected he would...and not for the last time.
What do you mean "wasn't in the bag?" You're Myrtle Beach slang is lost on me.
- SCHRADE in Akron