Re: RS review of Jagger disc

["L. Bird" <pkeets@hotmail.com>]

It sounded like an odd mixture from the jukebox.  Sometimes mixtures can be 
creative, but my impression from the brief listen was that this didn't all 
work together well.  Pete's guitar really beefed up the tracks he worked on, 
but the disco beat detracted.  It seems that dance albums should be dance 
albums, and nobody should worry about creativity.  If you're making art, on 
the other hand, disco is a cliche.  Whatever.  Let us know what you think 
about it, Jeff.

Meanwhile, I notice on the news that Mick had a private concert/party to 
promote his album in Hollywood.  David Spade, Jeff Goldblum, Billy Corgan, 
uh, and some other folks attended.  I looked for Pete, but guess he couldn't 
make it.  How do Mick and The Stones always make the news?  Are their 
private parties really news-worthy, or do they have deals and contacts that 
get them on CNN?


keets


>Rolling Stone gives Mick's new disc 5 stars.  They call it a classic. I've 
>read some things on some of the mail lists that it is limp and lousy. Of 
>course, the REAL test will be when I hear it and give my impression :-)
>
>Jeff